"The First Mustang..." you say?
Depends on how you define "The First Mustang..." because the actual
truth may never be known.

The phrase "The First Mustang..." is an oft abused term used everywhere
when the words have never been proven out - not by noted and respected
historians, rumor spreaders, or two guys at a car show debating the
subject.
The words..."The First Mustang..." make the hair on the back of my neck
point straight out because it is an unproven distortion of history. The
words are pure BS...
Before you is 5F08F100001 - the first Mustang "order" ever. With a
consecutive unit number of "100001", it is the first 1965 Mustang order
ever for the defuncted Dearborn, Michigan Assembly Plant, which closed
in May 2004. It does not make it the "first" Mustang and that's what
confuses people.
What does this mean?
Consecutive Unit Numbers for Ford Division cars began with 100001, then
100002, 100003, 100004 and so on. This made 5F08F100001 the first 1965
Mustang "order" or "job number" for the Dearborn Assembly Plant for the
1965 Model Year.

However, "consecutive unit number" does not mean how they were
positioned on the assembly line. "Consecutive Unit Number" is the job or
order number - not the order they were in on the assembly line.
The order they were in on the assembly line was the ROTATION NUMBER or
SEQUENCE NUMBER to where they could be easily located on the line. How
this was done gets darned confusing. And that is another subject
entirely.
5F08F100001 was not JOB 1 on March 9, 1964. It is believed somewhere
between 5FXXX100200 and 5F08F100211 was. March 9, 1964 was the start of
MASS PRODUCTION. Anything built prior to that date was considered
PRE-PRODUCTION.

I suspect a white or red convertible was the symbolic JOB 1. And THAT is
another subject entirely too.
Okay - back to "the First Mustang..." saga. There were actually a number
of "first" Mustangs. The prototypes... Hand-built bodies that were
nothing more than steel bodies for engineering purposes. Then, fully
assembled Mustang prototypes. Then, drivable prototypes. Prototypes
erected for a variety of engineering purposes - the fitment of parts,
revisions, stampings, and more. There were even crash test prototypes
built to be smashed and destroyed. Unknown how many.
It is unknown how many prototype Mustangs were produced - and later
destroyed. None would ever be in private hands though you never know
what went out the back door - so to speak. Factory records were
destroyed long ago.

Then.....there were "Pilot Plant" Mustangs produced at Ford's Allen Park
plant just south of the Dearborn plant on something of a mini assembly
line to refine how cars are assembled. They were 5SXXX100001 through
roughly 100009. There were likely more, but we've never seen a higher
Pilot Plant number than 100009.
Early in 1964, Dearborn began producing "pre-production" Mustangs with
"05C" date codes indicating their status as pre-production Mustang
units. The "05C" date code does not mean they were assembled March 5th.
Pre- Production
units range from 5F08F100001 through roughly 100180 or lower than
100200. Mustang units with an "05C" date code pre-production Mustangs.
They are NOT prototypes. To repeat - THEY ARE NOT PROTOTYPES.
There is a lot of mystery surrounding those first pre-production
Mustangs built prior to Monday, March 9, 1964. We may never know the
complete truth about them because Ford destroyed production records
prior to 1967. There are no photographs of Mustang JOB 1 on Monday,
March 9, 1964.
None...
No one has looked more extensively in the Ford archives for JOB 1 than
Donald Farr and me. Any images of JOB 1 are gone - likely pirated from
the archives or thrown away.
Summing this post up - "The First Mustang" remains unknown. Regardless
what has been in print or on the Internet - no one knows to this day. I
remain hopeful someone will confirm - and not with phony documentation
or word of mouth.
|